About
one year ago, almost exactly, I wrote a post about abandoning capitalism.
I thought I'd check in and see where the state of that line of thinking
has me these days.
At the
time, I called it a process into the unknown-- I just knew that I hated the
commodification and exploitation inherent in capitalistic systems.
Nothing's
changed there.
I've
been thinking a lot about the global economy lately and its interconnectivity.
If you pay attention to the stock markets at all, it's not hard to learn
that fluctuations in greece somehow impact the cost of stocks in the U.S.
I still don't know 100% how-- investor sentiment is powerful but it's
ultimately fake. Nothing is worth more than anyone's willing to pay for
it, so markets the world over are ultimately driven by the end consumer.
Pepsi, a stock I actually own some of, is priced right around 70.50 per
share this week. That's a price set by how much people are paying for it
as its traded on the NYSE- it's literally a market, supply/demand price.
It's also, however, when multiplied out, the total worth of the entire
pepsi corporation. That means its either more, less, or exactly how much
the company makes from sales, owns in assets, etc. The most important
part of that number is the sales- more the expected sales than anything else-
past sales have been either paid out or reinvested at this point.
Pepsi, a
corporation visible the world over, makes its money, ultimately, when people
buy drinks. That's not a surprise. People are either buying pepsi
or they aren't, but everyone is drinking something, or they're not living.
The ultimate longevity of the brand comes down to its appeal to
consumers. But at the end of the day, there are only so many consumers on
the face of the earth.
Jumping
quite a few steps back, there are only so many assets in the world- there are
only so many people, only so many hours to work and dollars to be made.
If Greece is making a difference in U.S. markets, I wonder if it’s anything to
worry about. The world economy is a closed system. It's a
monstrously huge and insidious system. But it's closed. Markets
will rise and markets will fall. The only reason it matters is if you're
putting your eggs too heavily in a basket that's falling. But if all the
baskets are falling, ultimately, it doesn't matter, I don't think- eventually,
it will lead to deflation and will self correct, at least somewhere in the
world.
That's
the writ-large nihilistic version of how I think about the economy.
But it's
not that simple. It would be, if everyone had equal access to wealth and
resources. But we don't. If everyone could choose to invest in
everything, it ultimately wouldn't matter. But there are people
everywhere who don’t have as much as a choice about what to eat every night.
That's
the disparity and it’s why rising tides never lift all boats. If you give
me 100 dollars to use as I wish, solely on myself, I'll either waste it or
invest it, but I won't give it to anyone who needs it, unless I've decided to
do something altruistic with it- and that's the rub.
Capitalism,
as an ideal is perfect because it ought to lead to actual growth and that
should trickle down. It never does though, because an investment in pepsi
isn't a necessary investment in a job for an unemployed person-- but an
investment in pepsi is a great decision from a fiscal standpoint.
Capitalism,
on its own, is broken and will be, because we live real lives in a real world
where we can't just jump on the meta-telescopic mobile and see how it doesn't
matter too much and we'll all be fine.
There
are only so many people in the world and they're all only living so many years.
The economies of the world will self-correct because the system is still
closed- but that doesn't say anything about the lives that get lost or broken
via the collateral damage.
And
that's why we've got to take the power into our own hands. I can make
money. I will make money. If I have my way, I'll make a lot of money.
But I can choose what I do with it, and, one year since denouncing
capitalism, my resolution stands firm and attempts to take action, even in
small, karmic ways have started: giving to those who ask on the streets,
tipping well because minimum wage can't afford a bare minimum life, choosing to
make money by non-exploitive ways, buying fair trade coffee—little stuff,
certainly, but something.
I still
live in a capitalist country and, unless Cleveland gets overtaken by a
different nation, I will for the rest of my life. But just because the
government won't share all its wealth with everyone doesn't mean I can't do my
best to do it myself.
I've
just barely scratched the surface, but one year in, I've realized that a rising
tide only carries all boats when you've thrown out the rope to tow the lower ones
up with you.
-Zack
"Why
can't we give love one more chance?"
-David Bowie
nicely said. and on a different but related systemic problem, I want to chat with you sometime about what you remember about IV's Price of Life campaigns. I have been reading and thinking about patriarchy a lot lately and thinking of the role it plays in human trafficking. I remember in Price of Life stuff talking a lot about systemic and personal sins of a greedy or sexual nature but I don't remember much conversation calling out patriarchy as a sin that supports trafficking. and that makes me sad. I was wondering if you remember differently?
ReplyDelete-Paul
Unfortunately, I do think you're right. Most of the time, it felt largely like the goal was cutting down to universal sin nature as the root of all problems-- obviously, there were a lot of things to juggle given the nature of the invitational, but you're right- the absence of any mention of the phallo-centric hegemony that creates trafficking (ultimately, probably more than anything else) is glaring in hindsight.
ReplyDelete